capital construction and servicing workspaces · Advanced
Rate-lock timing scenario comparison
Compare explicit lock delay and rate-change scenarios. Includes dated cash cost and break-even calculations.
Your assumptions
Illustrative starting values. Replace them with your own evidence. Inputs stay in this browser.
Your scenario, explained
Results
Calculation assumptions
Version 1.0.0 · Educational scenario, subject to the stated assumptions.
How this calculation works
Method and assumptions
Use equal post-closing loan holding periods at locked, lower, baseline and higher rates. Add lock-specific fees or the separately entered preclosing delay costs and later fees to interest costs; report ending balances separately.
Worked example
For $3 million over a 60-month post-closing hold with 30-year amortization, locking at the default 6.5% plus a $15,000 lock cost produces $961,051.77 nominal financing cost. Waiting two months costs $20,000 before closing. If the later rate is also 6.5%, total cost is $966,051.77, or $5,000 more. At 5.5% it is $815,838.31; at 7.5% it is $1,117,109.21. These are scenarios, not rate predictions.
Before using the result
Know the boundaries
- Educational scenario, not a quote, commitment, approval, appraisal or payoff statement.
- Defaults and thresholds are editable illustrations; the executed documents and lender underwriting control.
- Scenarios are not interest-rate forecasts. Equal post-closing holding periods are compared without discounting; loan timing and business cash flows can change the decision.
Method references
Discuss your financing with Jaken Finance Group ↗Keep working through the decision
Related resources
Lower loan coupon versus greater closing certainty
Compare expected cash cost under explicit delay scenarios. Includes quote economics and delay exposure decision table.
Prepayment timing comparison
Compare dated financing alternatives using supplied payoff costs. Includes break-even and cash-flow comparison without fabricated payoff quotes.